Authors

Malcolm S. Hill, University of Richmond
April L. Hill, University of Richmond
Jose V. Lopez, Nova Southeastern University
Kevin J. Peterson, Dartmouth College
Shirley A. Pomponi, Florida Atlantic University
Maria Cristina Diaz, Museo Marino de Margarita
Robert W. Thacker, University of Alabama
Maja Adamska, Sars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology
Nicole Boury-Esnault, Universite´ d’Aix-Marseille
Paco Cárdenas, Uppsala University
Andia Chaves-Fonnegra, Nova Southeastern University
Elizabeth Danka, University of Richmond
Bre-Onna De Laine, University of Richmond
Dawn Formica, Nova Southeastern University
Eduardo Hajdu, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Gisele Lobo-Hajdu, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Sarah Klontz, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian
Christine C. Morrow, Queen’s University
Jignasa Patel, Nova Southeastern University
Bernard Picton, National Museums Northern Ireland
Davide Pisani, University of Bristol
Deborah Pohlmann, University of Richmond
Niamh E. Redmond, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian
John K. Reed, Florida Atlantic University
Stacy Richey,, University of Richmond
Ana Riesgo, Harvard University
Ewelina Rubin, Nova Southeastern University
Zach Russell, University of Richmond
Klaus Rützler, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian
Erik A. Sperling, Harvard University
Michael di Stefano, University of Richmond
James E. Tarver, University of Bristol
Allen G. Collins, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian
Senjie Lin, University of Connecticut

Author Type

Faculty

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Background: Demosponges are challenging for phylogenetic systematics because of their plastic and relatively simple morphologies and many deep divergences between major clades. To improve understanding of the phylogenetic relationships within Demospongiae, we sequenced and analyzed seven nuclear housekeeping genes involved in a variety of cellular functions from a diverse group of sponges. Methodology/Principal Findings: We generated data from each of the four sponge classes (i.e., Calcarea, Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, and Homoscleromorpha), but focused on family-level relationships within demosponges. With data for 21 newly sampled families, our Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian-based approaches recovered previously phylogenetically defined taxa: Keratosap, Myxospongiaep, Spongillidap, Haploscleromorphap (the marine haplosclerids) and Democlaviap. We found conflicting results concerning the relationships of Keratosap and Myxospongiaep to the remaining demosponges, but our results strongly supported a clade of Haploscleromorphap+Spongillidap+Democlaviap. In contrast to hypotheses based on mitochondrial genome and ribosomal data, nuclear housekeeping gene data suggested that freshwater sponges (Spongillidap) are sister to Haploscleromorphap rather than part of Democlaviap. Within Keratosap, we found equivocal results as to the monophyly of Dictyoceratida. Within Myxospongiaep, Chondrosida and Verongida were monophyletic. A wellsupported clade within Democlaviap, Tetractinellidap, composed of all sampled members of Astrophorina and Spirophorina (including the only lithistid in our analysis), was consistently revealed as the sister group to all other members of Democlaviap. Within Tetractinellidap, we did not recover monophyletic Astrophorina or Spirophorina. Our results also reaffirmed the monophyly of order Poecilosclerida (excluding Desmacellidae and Raspailiidae), and polyphyly of Hadromerida and Halichondrida. Conclusions/Significance: These results, using an independent nuclear gene set, confirmed many hypotheses based on ribosomal and/or mitochondrial genes, and they also identified clades with low statistical support or clades that conflicted with traditional morphological classification. Our results will serve as a basis for future exploration of these outstanding questions using more taxon- and gene-rich datasets.

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0050437 (doi)

Publication Date

1-23-2013

Share

COinS