Author Type

Undergraduate Student

Date of Award

Spring 5-4-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Publication Status

Version of Record

Submission Date

July 2026

College Granting Degree

Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College

Thesis/Dissertation Advisor [Chair]

Mark Tunick

Abstract

In 2010, the Supreme Court, in Citizens United v. FEC, held that corporations have a First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Soon after, privately held corporations were effectively granted the First Amendment right to exercise religion, in Burwell v Hobby Lobby. Should corporations have these rights, or are rights reserved for “persons”? I argue that for-profit corporations, as artificial entities, lack the capacities for personhood and moral agency, including the capacity to express speech or exercise religion, without the use of a human agent. Since corporations are not moral agents, they don’t possess rights inherently and shouldn’t be granted constitutional rights to freedom of speech or religion. Instead, corporate legal rights should be limited to the rights of property and contract, which are granted due to the benefits they provide to the human agents that are involved in corporations, including employees and shareholders.

Download

Share

COinS