Author Type

Undergraduate Student

Date of Award

Spring 4-25-2025

Document Type

Thesis

Publication Status

Version of Record

Submission Date

July 2026

College Granting Degree

Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College

Thesis/Dissertation Advisor [Chair]

Timothy Steigenga

Abstract

Realism and then neorealism were the dominant paradigms in international relations theory from the 1940s through the 1990s. These theories treat states as largely rational actors responding to the security dilemma through self-help in an international environment characterized by anarchy. Thus, policies such as Ronald Reagan’s Operation Cyclone supporting the Mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight against the Soviet occupation have been explained through the lens of realism. Since the end of the Cold War, constructivist theorists have questioned both the assumptions and the predictions of realism. This thesis evaluates Reagan’s policy in Afghanistan, comparing the constructivist and realist approaches, and argues that constructivism provides a better explanation for policy than realism. Furthermore, the insights arising from the constructivist approach are useful for informing policy and potentially reducing the long-term blowback effects, like the eventual formation of Al Qaeda and the attacks of 9/11.

Share

COinS