Date of Award
2000
Document Type
Thesis
Publication Status
Version of Record
Submission Date
October 2026
Thesis/Dissertation Advisor [Chair]
Richman, Fred
Abstract
The earliest known system of formal logic, syllogistic logic , was set forth by Aristotle in Prior Analytics, which appeared around 350 B.C. A syllogism contains three statements, two premises and a conclusion. Each of the statements is one of four types, A, E, I, or O, which determines the mood of the syllogism. The four possible figures of a syllogism are determined by the arrangement of the terms within the statements. The form of a syllogism consists of both a mood and a figure, so there are 256 possible forms. A valid syllogism is one in which if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. While Aristotle found 19 valid forms of the 256 possible, and others later found 24, it is now generally agreed that there are 15. Together, these consist of all possible ways to construct valid arguments within this system of syllogistic logic. We can use the rules of this system and certain operations to change statements and convert one valid form to another. We can also present these forms using various geometric representations.
Extent
51 p.
Recommended Citation
Richards, Dawne Maria, "Categorical syllogisms" (2000). Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2000 - 2009. 13.
https://digitalcommons.fau.edu/etd_general_5/13
Identifier
FADT15793
Comments
Charles E. Schmidt College of Science|Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2000.|Charles E. Schmidt College of Science