Author

Author Type

Graduate Student

Date of Award

1983

Document Type

Dissertation

Publication Status

Version of Record

Submission Date

October 2026

Thesis/Dissertation Advisor [Chair]

Floyd, Marilyn J.

Abstract

Measurement experts have criticized the use of essay examinations, chiefly because of their scoring unreliability. Research has emnhasized scoring inconsistencies and that scorers of essay examinations are frequently led by composition errors or other writing quality factors to grade the subject matter--content--of the essays inconsistently. Studies critical of essay scoring have emphasized the content of essay answers and have used scorers with minimal expertise in the essays' subject areas. Recent research reveals that, under certain conditions, i.e., when writing experts are scoring for placement, using appropriate grading criteria, reliability rates for essay scoring are improving. Besides making distinctions between grading conditions and purposes, recent studies distinguish between content and writing skills, and emphasize examination of how content characteristics of student essays influence teachers' ratings. This study focused on whether freshman placement essays would be graded consistently by different groups of college faculty, experts in writing and experts in the topic of the essays. Also examined were how content designated as strong and weak would influence the overall scores and the scoring of writing quality.

Extent

121 p.

Comments

Includes bibliography.|Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 1983.|College of Education|FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection|Includes bibliography.

Identifier

FA00000678

Format

pdf

Share

COinS