Date of Award
1971
Document Type
Thesis
Publication Status
Version of Record
Submission Date
October 2026
Thesis/Dissertation Advisor [Chair]
Kliston, Theodore S.
Abstract
It is the hypothesis of the writer that the average middle-income person would be better advised to purchase a whole life policy rather than to buy a "lower-cost" term policy with the thought of using the difference in "cost" to invest in common stock, possibly in an effort to combat inflation. An analysis is made of the returns one might expect from each method of investment, based on data in the past decade. On the basis of this analysis, it would seem that a person would have fared about equally well in a choice between the two methods, provided that such person did at least as well in the selection of stock investments as the averages of stock market results (in terms of over-all income, including both capital gains and dividends). Although no conclusive choice would appear to be warranted, the uncertainties inherent in the purchase of term insurance and investment in stocks would appear to preclude such alternative for any person not wishing to speculate.
Extent
61 p.
Recommended Citation
HALDEMAN, WILLIAM EVAN, "ANALYSIS OF BUYING WHOLE LIFE INSURANCE VERSUS THE PURCHASE OF TERM INSURANCE AND INVESTING THE DIFFERENCE IN PREMIUMS IN STOCK" (1971). Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1970 - 1979. 41.
https://digitalcommons.fau.edu/etd_general_2/41
Identifier
FADT13431
Comments
Thesis (M.B.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 1971.|College of Business|FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection|Thesis (M.B.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 1971.