Author Type

Graduate Student

Date of Award

Summer 7-21-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Publication Status

Version of Record

Submission Date

August 2026

Department

Political Science

College Granting Degree

Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters

Department Granting Degree

Political Science

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

Thesis/Dissertation Advisor [Chair]

Jeffrey Morton

Abstract

This thesis examines the unique relationship between nongovernmental human rights reporting, and U.S. congressional attention during the post-Cold War period, 1989-2004. Using a longitudinal content analysis research method, it compares human rights-related resolutions from the 101st through 108th Congresses with materials from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Human Rights First. Rather than claiming causation, the study evaluates whether congressional country or issues mentioned overlapped with NGO reporting during those same sessions. The findings show recurring overlap between congressional attention and NGO-identified countries, abuses, and normative claims. This convergence suggests that NGOs operated within a democratic information environment yet simultaneous recognition that congressional attention may also reflect world events, executive priorities, media coverage, geopolitical interests, and other advocacy networks is also crucial to this study.

Share

COinS