Date of Award

2011

Document Type

Dissertation/Thesis

Submission Date

October 2026

Thesis/Dissertation Advisor [Chair]

Tunick, Mark

Thesis/Dissertation Co-Chair

Earles, Julie

Abstract

Privacy as a legal concept affects every single American citizen whether they know it or not. Justice Harlan's concurrence in Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 defined an expectation of privacy as one that society must recognize as objectively reasonable. The court has used this doctrine to establish different privacy tests for different situations, yet has never empirically determined whether its decisions accurately reflect society's view of what is 'reasonable.' To that end, this paper will examine the philosophical and historical origins of the right to privacy, and well as its development by the Supreme Court to its current status. I'll compare the Supreme Court's interpretation of society's expectations with empirical data from psychological studies and conduct a normative analysis to determine if the Supreme Court has accurately interpreted society's expectations and correctly crafted the right to privacy to ideally protect the citizens and limit state invasions of privacy.

Comments

Includes bibliography.

Extent

70 p.

Identifier

FA00003593

Share

COinS